Thermal Energy Storage

Store cheap clean energy
as heat — use it later.

A high-temperature thermal "heat battery" (sand / rock / concrete) with an optional Stirling / ORC module that returns electricity on demand.

Product Family

Svarog Core

Anchor sand/rock high-temperature heat-battery unit

Svarog Block

Modular concrete/block variant

Svarog +P

Stirling / ORC heat-to-power (Carnot battery) tier

Svarog OS

Controls & optimiser software — core IP, future SaaS

Markets

Home

Slovenia

Expansion

Austria · Italy (North) · Croatia · Hungary

Strategic

Ukraine (R&D + resilience market)

Technology Tiers

Sensible (solid) Sensible (water) Latent (PCM) Thermochemical Heat-to-power (+P)

Anchor technology: Sensible-heat solid media (sand / rock / concrete)

Name Alternatives

Kresnik

Slovenian solar/fire folk hero — Slovenia-first fallback

Calora

Latin calor = heat — neutral, pan-European

ThermaBank

English thermal + bank — descriptive but generic

Why Svarog?

Three core value propositions every customer segment cares about.

Cut Energy Cost

Arbitrage and peak-shaving shift energy purchase to cheap hours and reduce capacity charges.

Decarbonise & Comply

Meet RED III, EU ETS and corporate ESG targets with demonstrable carbon reduction.

Resilience

Optional +P tier delivers heat and electricity through outages — energy security on-site.

Storage Materials

Compare sensible, latent and thermochemical media. Order-of-magnitude planning values.

Material cp (kJ/kg·K) Density (kg/m³) Vol. Heat Cap. (kJ/m³·K) Max Temp (°C) Notes
Water 4.18 1,000 4,180 95 Best per-kg; cheap; limited to <100 °C unpressurised
Sand / silica 0.8 1,500 1,200 1,000 Cheap, abundant, high-temp; air heat-transfer medium
Basalt / rock 0.9 2,900 2,610 1,000 High volumetric capacity; packed-bed
Concrete 0.88 2,300 2,024 1,200 Castable, structural; modular blocks
Molten salt (solar nitrate) 1.5 1,900 2,850 565 Liquid; freezes below ~220 °C
Class Melt Point (°C) Latent Heat (kJ/kg) Conductivity (W/m·K) Notes
Paraffin wax 20–70 150–250 0.2–0.4 Organic, flammable, stable
Fatty acids 20–70 150–200 0.2–0.3 Organic, less corrosive
Salt hydrates 30–120 200–350 0.5–1.2 Inorganic, non-flammable, cheap; may supercool
Eutectic salts 50–250 100–250 0.5–2.0 Tunable
Class Storage Density (GJ/m³) Notes
Salt hydrate / sorption (e.g. zeolite-water) ~1.0 Near-zero standing loss (reactants stored separately); R&D to pilot; seasonal storage

Core Formulas

Sensible Heat
Q = m · cp · dT

Mass × specific heat × temperature change

Sensible (Volumetric)
Q = V · ρcp · dT

Volume × volumetric heat capacity × dT

Latent Heat
Q = m · L

Mass × latent heat of fusion

Thermochemical
Q = n · dHr

Moles × reaction enthalpy

Standing Loss
loss = U · A · (Tstore − Tamb)

U-value × surface area × temperature difference

Heat → Power

The Carnot battery concept: store electricity as heat, convert it back on demand.

Carnot Battery

Stores electricity as heat and converts it back to electricity (power-to-heat-to-power).

Term coined

DLR / André Thess, 2018

Origin

Fritz Marguerre patent ~1924

Round-trip efficiency

40–70%

Optimisation study

57% · €0.649/kWh

Carnot Ceiling
η = 1 − Tc / Th (Kelvin)

Example: 600 °C hot, 300 K cold → ceiling ≈ 65.6%. Real Stirling: 30–40%.

Key advantage: Can reuse a retired fossil plant's turbine, generator and grid connection.

Heat-to-Power Technologies

Technology Temp Range (°C) Scale Real Efficiency Maturity Best Fit Vendors
Stirling engine 500–800 1–55 kWe 30–40% Commercial (niche) Small CHP, off-grid, resilience Qnergy, Cleanergy, Microgen, Inresol, STM
ORC 80–350 10 kW – MW 10–25% Mature Medium-temp, mid/large sites Turboden, Enogia, Orcan, Exergy
Steam Rankine >450 MW–GW 30–45% Very mature Large DH / reused coal turbines Siemens, GE, reused coal-plant turbines
sCO₂ / Brayton >500 MW 35–50% Emerging Compact large-scale; watch Echogen, Hanwha
TPV >1,000 Modular 20–40% (lab) Emerging Ultra-high-temp, no moving parts Antora, Fourth Power
Thermoelectric (TEG) Any dT W–kW 5–8% Mature Sensor/IoT power only

Stirling Engine: Pros & Cons

Advantages
  • External heat source (any heat works)
  • Very quiet (no valves/intake/exhaust)
  • Low maintenance, long life
  • Safe (sealed working gas)
  • Commercially proven since 2003 (micro-CHP, 55 kWe, dish-Stirling, submarines)
Limitations
  • Low power-to-weight (best for static installs)
  • Must warm up (no instant start)
  • Best at constant speed
  • Smaller per-unit power (1–55 kWe)

Precedent Lesson: Azelio (Sweden)

Aluminium PCM 600 °C + Stirling → Bankrupt 2022

The technology works. The lesson: treat +P as an optional CHP/resilience tier, not as a pure power-arbitrage play.

Charging Sources

Where the energy to charge the store comes from — solar, wind, thermal/waste heat, geothermal, hydro, biomass and grid surplus.

Power-to-Heat (P2H)

Electricity → heat via resistive/electrode heaters (~99%) or a heat pump (COP 2–5). Used by PV, wind, hydro and grid-surplus sources.

Direct heat capture

A hot fluid/stream is stored directly — solar thermal, industrial/data-centre waste heat, geothermal, biomass/biogas CHP. Marginal charge cost often ≈ €0 for waste streams.

Charging-Source Research

Source Pathway Charge cost Useful temp / quality Seasonality Best customer fit Main limitation
Solar PV (surplus) P2H ≈€0–0.05/kWh any (resistive to 600 °C+) Summer-peaking, daily PV owners with heat demand Daytime only; needs store to time-shift
Solar thermal direct heat ≈€0 fuel 60–120 °C (flat/evac), 150–400 °C (conc.) Summer-peaking Hotels, spas, agriculture, DH Collector area; weather-dependent
Wind / curtailed renewables P2H €0–0.04/kWh any Winter-peaking, gusty Industry, DH near wind Variable; limited inside SI terrain
Off-peak / negative-price grid P2H €0.02–0.07/kWh; sometimes <€0 any Daily/nightly troughs Any grid-connected site Tariff/market access; price risk
Industrial waste heat direct heat ≈€0 80–500 °C+ Continuous (process-linked) Glass, metals, food, foundries Site-specific; HX integration
Data-centre waste heat direct heat (+HP) ≈€0–low 30–45 °C (needs HP upgrade) Continuous Colocation/edge + DH offtake Low grade; needs heat-pump lift
Geothermal direct heat low (pumping only) 40–150 °C (SI Pannonian belt) Base-load, stable Pomurje spas, DH, agriculture Drilling CAPEX; resource-bound
Biomass / biogas CHP direct heat low (fuel-linked) 80–500 °C Dispatchable/seasonal Farms, rural DH, sawmills Fuel logistics; emissions limits
Hydro / micro-hydro P2H low (cheap baseload/spill) any Spring/melt-peaking Alpine valleys, rural mills Geography-bound; water rights
Grid surplus (curtailment) P2H ≈€0 when curtailed any Rising with RE share DH/industry as flexible load Needs interruptible contract

Public-source planning ranges (Source #26); validate per site and per year. Geothermal in the Pannonian/Pomurje belt is a genuine regional edge; waste heat (≈€0) is the single best economic charging source.

Combined / Hybrid Systems (highest-value configurations)

PV + heat pump + TES

Store midday PV as heat via an efficient HP; cover evening/winter load; maximise self-consumption.

Homes, hotels, commercial

Wind/grid off-peak + TES (+P)

Soak curtailed/negative-price power; optionally return dispatchable electricity.

Industry, DH, resilience

Solar thermal + TES

Buffer summer collection for night/shoulder season; seasonal with pit stores.

Spas, agriculture, DH

Waste heat + heat pump + TES

Capture low-grade waste heat (≈€0), upgrade temperature, time-shift to demand.

Data centres, food, foundries

Geothermal + PV + TES

Stable geothermal base heat + variable solar top-up, smoothed by the store.

Pannonian spas, greenhouses, DH

Hydro/grid + TES (+P)

Cheap spill-season electricity in; heat + optional power out for resilience.

Alpine/rural microgrids, Ukraine

Design principle. Size the store to the combined charging profile (multiple cheap inputs) and the single dischargeable load. Hybrid charging raises annual cycles and cuts the blended charge price — the two biggest levers on payback. For the +P tier, combine a firm source (geothermal/biomass/hydro) with a variable source (PV/wind) for the most resilient Carnot-battery configuration.

Target Segments

Nine customer segments sized, prioritised and mapped to the right sales motion — each with its best-fit charging sources.

Beachhead: Industrial process heat Beachhead: High-temp industry Beachhead: Agriculture
High 0.5–20 MWh

Industrial process heat

Breweries, dairies, bakeries, food driers, ceramics, plastics, laundries

Pain: Expensive gas/peak power for 60–200 °C process heat; decarbonisation pressure

Charge: process waste heat (≈€0), off-peak/curtailed grid, on-site PV

Direct B2B + EPC; energy-audit-led

High 5–100 MWh

High-temp industry

Glassworks, foundries, cement, aluminium

Pain: 500–1,500 °C heat + huge waste heat; ETS/CO₂ cost

Charge: high-grade waste heat (≈€0), off-peak/curtailed grid

Direct + EPC; waste-heat-recovery led

High 0.2–5 MWh

Agriculture

Greenhouses, dairy farms, fruit/herb drying, biogas plants

Pain: Winter greenhouse heat; use summer sun / biogas/geothermal waste heat

Charge: biomass/biogas CHP, geothermal, solar PV/thermal

Direct + ag cooperatives; subsidy-led

Medium 0.1–2 MWh

Hospitality

Hotels, wellness/spas, thermal baths, pools

Pain: Large constant DHW + pool heat; PV self-consumption

Charge: solar thermal, geothermal, PV surplus

Direct + HVAC installers

Medium 0.05–1 MWh

Commercial buildings

Offices, retail, schools, hospitals

Pain: Peak-shaving, PV self-use, comfort

Charge: PV surplus, off-peak grid

HVAC/ESCO channel

Medium 5–1,000+ MWh

District heating / municipal

Velenje, Ljubljana, town DH operators

Pain: Flexibility, peak-boiler avoidance, solar/heat-pump integration, coal phase-out

Charge: curtailed wind/grid, waste heat, solar thermal, geothermal, biomass

Tender/EPC; long cycle

High-Strategic 0.1–10 MWh

Dispatchable power / resilience

Off-grid sites, microgrids, critical facilities, Ukraine reconstruction

Pain: Blackout resilience; electricity + heat from one store (Carnot battery)

Charge: firm source (geothermal/biomass/hydro) + variable PV/wind

Project/B2B; grant-funded

Medium 1–50 MWh

Data centres

Colocation, edge sites

Pain: Monetise/offload waste heat to DH or neighbours

Charge: server waste heat (low-grade) + heat-pump lift

Partnership/B2B

Volume / Brand 5–50 kWh

Residential

Homes with PV + heat pump

Pain: Self-consume PV, shift heating to cheap hours

Charge: PV surplus, off-peak grid

Installer channel + Eko Sklad

Per-Segment Customer Economics

Segment Store Size CAPEX (after subsidy) Annual Saving Payback Net Benefit (20yr) CO₂ Cut / yr
Residential 20–40 kWh €2,800–6,300 €350–900 6–10 yr €5,000–13,000 0.5–1.5 t
Commercial building 0.1–1 MWh €5,600–38,500 €1,500–9,000 5–7 yr €25,000–150,000 3–25 t
Hospitality / spa 0.3–2 MWh €17,500–84,000 €4,000–20,000 5–8 yr €60,000–300,000 8–45 t
Agriculture 0.5–5 MWh €21,000–175,000 €6,000–45,000 4–7 yr €90,000–650,000 12–90 t
Industrial process heat 0.5–20 MWh €14,000–490,000 €5,000–180,000 4–7 yr €80,000–2,600,000 15–500 t
High-temp industry 5–100 MWh €140,000–2,800,000 €40,000–900,000 3–6 yr €600,000–13,000,000 100–3,000 t
District heating / municipal 5 MWh – GWh Grant/co-funded €60,000–3,000,000 6–12 yr €1M–40M 200–10,000 t

Assumptions: ~30% subsidy, gross saving €8–12/kWh capacity/year for well-cycled C&I/agri, asset life 20–30 years.

Customer Benefits

Lower, predictable energy bills

Fast payback (4–8 yr C&I) vs 20–30 yr life

Decarbonisation & compliance

Subsidy capture (~20–40% lower CAPEX)

Resilience via optional +P tier

Higher PV self-consumption

Low operating burden

Brand & sustainability reporting

Economics & Business Model

CAPEX benchmarks, savings formula, unit economics and funding levers.

CAPEX Benchmarks (EUR/kWh)

Storage Type Low High Context
Sensible solid media (sand/rock/concrete) €15 €60 Industrial heat-battery range
Large water pit (seasonal) €0.4 €0.6 Danish pit stores (~€30/m³)
Water buffer tank €1 €10 Standard hydronic; cheaper at scale
PCM / latent €50 €150 Material-dependent, compact
Molten salt (CSP-type) €20 €60 Utility scale
Li-ion NMC battery (for contrast) €150 €400 Electricity storage — TES far cheaper for heat
LiFePO4 / LFP battery (for contrast) €110 €300 Cheaper, safer Li chemistry; still electricity-only

Storing energy as heat is ~10–30× cheaper per kWh than Li-ion/LFP when the end use is heat.

Storage Alternatives: where LiFePO4 / LFP & others fit

TES and batteries are not competitors for the same job — the right choice depends on the output the customer needs. A well-designed site often pairs an LFP battery (electricity) with a TES store (heat).

Storage option Stores → delivers CAPEX basis Round-trip Duration Response Best-fit job
TES — sensible (sand/rock/concrete) elec/heat → heat €15–60/kWhth 85–93% (heat) hours–days minutes Cheap large-scale & high-temp heat
TES + Stirling/ORC (+P) elec/heat → heat + electricity +€800–3000/kWe 40–70% (elec) hours–days minutes (warm) Dispatchable power with heat; resilience
LiFePO4 / LFP battery electricity → electricity €110–300/kWh 90–95% 1–4 h milliseconds Electricity backup, fast response, PV self-use
Li-ion NMC battery electricity → electricity €150–400/kWh 90–95% 1–4 h milliseconds High energy density where space is tight
Lead-acid battery electricity → electricity €100–250/kWh 75–85% hours milliseconds Low-cost short backup/UPS
Sodium-ion battery electricity → electricity €80–250/kWh 85–92% 1–6 h milliseconds Emerging low-cost LFP alternative
Vanadium / redox flow electricity → electricity €250–600/kWh 65–80% 4–12 h <1 s Long-duration electricity, many cycles
Pumped hydro (PHES) electricity → electricity €40–120/kWh 70–85% 6–20 h seconds Bulk grid storage where geography allows
Compressed air (CAES) electricity → electricity (+heat) €40–150/kWh 40–70% 6–24 h minutes Long-duration bulk; cavern sites
Liquid air (LAES) electricity → electricity (+heat/cold) €100–300/kWh 50–70% 6–24 h minutes Siting-flexible long-duration
Flywheel electricity → electricity €1,000–5,000/kWh 85–90% seconds–min milliseconds Frequency/power quality, not energy
Green hydrogen / P2G electricity → fuel/elec/heat varies 25–45% (e→e) days–months minutes Seasonal/long-haul, hard-to-electrify

Decision rule. Need heat (process, DHW, space, district)? → TES wins on cost (10–30×). Need fast electrical backup / 1–4 h power? → LFP wins. Need both heat and dispatchable power / blackout resilience? → TES + Stirling/ORC (+P) — the Svarog differentiator, especially for the Ukraine resilience market. Need seasonal? → water-pit / thermochemical TES (heat) or PHES/CAES/hydrogen (electricity).

Annual Savings Formula
AnnualSaving ≈ Ncycles × Qusable × (pdisplaced − pcharge / ηrt) − O&M

Ncycles = cycles per year · Q = usable heat per cycle · p = price per kWh · ηrt = round-trip efficiency

Worked Example

Site

Food producer, ~120 °C process heat

Daily heat

500 kWh

Charge price

€0.05/kWh

Displaced price

€0.09/kWh

Cycles/year

300

Round-trip η

90%

Gross spread

€0.034/kWh

System size

600 kWh

CAPEX @ €40/kWh

€24,000

Annual Saving

€5,100

Payback

~4.7 yr

Single-digit years; improved further by subsidy, CO₂ price and waste-heat charging.

Slovenia Energy Prices

Electricity VT (high)

€0.084/kWh

Electricity NT (low)

€0.070/kWh

Electricity ET (uniform)

€0.077/kWh

Non-household YoY

-16.6%

Gas excise

€0.00086/kWh

District heating

€25–93/MWh

Period: Nov 2024 – Feb 2025, energy component excl. VAT.

Revenue Models

CAPEX sale Heat-as-a-Service (HaaS) ESCO / shared savings Lease / subscription Software/optimiser SaaS Power-purchase (Carnot)

Funding Levers

  • Eko Sklad grants + soft loans + tax relief
  • EU just-transition & cohesion funds
  • Horizon Europe (Ukraine-eligible)
  • EU ETS carbon price

Savings & Sizing Calculator

Estimate store size, CAPEX, annual savings and payback for a site. Adjust the inputs — results update live.

Inputs

Net annual saving

€4,687

Payback (after subsidy)

3.6 yr

Store size

600 kWh

CAPEX (before subsidy)

€24,000

CAPEX (after subsidy)

€16,800

Effective spread

€0.034/kWh

Annual heat throughput

150,000 kWh

Gross annual saving

€5,167

O&M cost / yr

€480

Payback (before subsidy)

5.1 yr

~20-yr net benefit

€76,940

Model
AnnualSaving ≈ Ncycles × Qdaily × (pdisplaced − pcharge / ηrt) − O&M

Same formula as §6 Economics. Order-of-magnitude planning estimate — validate per site (tariffs, load profile, subsidy eligibility).

Target Prospects

Top 10 named Slovenian prospects with entry angles and priorities.

# Company Segment Why Size Entry Angle Priority
1 Pivovarna Laško Union
Heineken
Brewery / food Large constant 60–100 °C process heat & DHW; ESG targets; relatable reference 1–10 MWh Energy audit → process-heat pilot High
2 Perutnina Ptuj
MHP (Ukraine)
Food / poultry Big steady heat demand; Slovenia↔Ukraine bridge 2–15 MWh Corporate decarbonisation + bridge story High
3 Steklarna Hrastnik Glassworks 1,000 °C+ furnaces, huge waste heat; high CO₂/ETS cost 5–50 MWh Waste-heat capture + high-temp store High
4 Sava Hotels / Terme 3000 Hospitality / spa Constant pool + DHW heat; geothermal; PV self-consumption 0.5–3 MWh DHW/pool buffer + geothermal coupling High
5 Paradajz (Lust) / Ocean Orchids Agriculture Year-round greenhouse heat; geothermal + summer-sun storage 0.5–5 MWh Seasonal/geothermal heat store; subsidy-led High
6 Ljubljanske mlekarne
Lactalis
Dairy / food Pasteurisation + CIP hot water; steady load 1–8 MWh Process-heat + waste-heat pilot Medium
7 Talum Aluminium Energy-intensive; large waste heat; decarbonisation pressure 10–100 MWh Waste-heat → store → CHP/power Medium
8 KP Velenje / HSE-TES (Šoštanj)
HSE
District heating / coal exit Flagship coal-to-Carnot-battery; reuse turbines + DH grid 10–1,000+ MWh Just-transition flagship High
9 Energetika Ljubljana District heating Large DH operator decarbonising; storage for flexibility 10+ MWh DH flexibility / integration tender Medium
10 Thermana Laško / Terme Olimia / Terme Čatež Hospitality / spa Multiple spa sites = repeatable SKU 0.3–2 MWh Repeatable spa DHW/pool product Medium

High-Temp Industry

  • • Steklarna Hrastnik
  • • Steklarna Rogaška
  • • Talum (Kidričevo)
  • • Salonit Anhovo
  • • Cinkarna Celje

Food & Beverage

  • • Pivovarna Laško Union
  • • Perutnina Ptuj
  • • Ljubljanske mlekarne
  • • Žito
  • • Mlinotest
  • • Panvita

Agriculture

  • • Paradajz (Lust)
  • • Ocean Orchids

Hospitality & Spa

  • • Sava Hotels / Terme 3000
  • • Terme Čatež
  • • Thermana Laško
  • • Terme Olimia
  • • Terme Krka

District Heating

  • • KP Velenje / HSE-TES (Šoštanj)
  • • Energetika Ljubljana

Marquee Plays

TES / Velenje Coal → Carnot Battery

Reuse turbines, generator, grid + existing DH network. EU just-transition funding. Flagship reference.

Perutnina Ptuj Slovenia↔Ukraine Bridge

MHP ownership links Slovenian C&I market and Ukrainian opportunity through one relationship.

Partners & Vendors

Reference vendors, regional partners and academia for R&D collaboration.

Storage Reference Vendors

Polar Night Energy Finland

Sand battery (~600 °C, ~100 MWh)

Closest proof-of-concept to anchor product

Kraftblock Germany

Recycled granulate to ~1,300 °C

High-temp benchmark / possible licensor

Rondo Energy USA

Firebrick heat battery

Industrial decarbonisation benchmark

Brenmiller Energy Israel

bGen crushed-rock modular TES

Modular commercial benchmark

MGA Thermal Australia

Miscibility-gap alloy blocks

Novel media benchmark

EnergyNest Norway

Concrete Heatcrete modules

Concrete-module benchmark

Azelio Sweden · Defunct

Aluminium PCM 600 °C + Stirling

Heat-to-power precedent; defunct 2022 (lesson)

Heat-to-Power Vendors

Stirling

  • • Qnergy (US)
  • • Cleanergy (SE)
  • • Microgen (UK)
  • • Inresol (SE)
  • • STM (55 kW)

ORC

  • • Turboden (IT)
  • • Enogia (FR)
  • • Orcan (DE)
  • • Exergy (IT)

Steam

  • • Siemens
  • • GE
  • • Reused coal turbines

sCO₂ / Brayton

  • • Echogen
  • • Hanwha

TPV

  • • Antora
  • • Fourth Power

Regional Partners

Knauf Insulation Slovenia

Insulation supplier

Kronoterm / Termo-tehnika Slovenia

Heat-pump manufacturer

Ochsner Austria

High-temp heat pumps

Turboden Italy

ORC heat-to-power partner

SMA / Fronius DE / AT

Inverters / power electronics

Danfoss Denmark

Valves / controls

Academia & R&D

University of Ljubljana Slovenia

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering

Jožef Stefan Institute Slovenia

National research institute

Inst. Engineering Thermophysics Ukraine · Kyiv

NAS Ukraine — thermal research

Pidhorny Institute Ukraine · Kharkiv

Power machinery & systems (NAS)

Kyiv Polytechnic Ukraine · Kyiv

Igor Sikorsky KPI

Lviv Polytechnic Ukraine · Lviv

National University

Sources & References

Citations and data sources behind every figure on this page.

# Category Title Source Use
1EU policyEuropean Commission — Heating and coolingenergy.ec.europa.euH&C share of energy; renewable share; EU H&C Strategy
2EU dataEurostat — Energy consumption in householdseurostat.ec.europa.euSpace + water heating ~77.1% of household final energy (2024)
3EU dataEurostat — Electricity & gas price statisticseurostat.ec.europa.euNon-household electricity price change SI -16.6% YoY
4EU policyRenewable Energy Directive (RED III)EU/2023/2413Binding annual increases in renewable H&C; waste-heat provisions
5SloveniaGovernment of Slovenia / Agencija za energijogov.siRegulated household tariffs; excise; market transition Mar 2025
6SloveniaEko Skladekosklad.siGrants/loans; subsidy increase Jun 2026; green-transition tax relief
7SloveniaDistrict-heating statistics (SI)~22% coverage; 47/210 municipalities; ~1.7 GW; DH prices €25–93/MWh
8SloveniaHSE / TES (Šoštanj)hse.siCoal phase-out (~2033); Velenje DH network
9TechnologyPolar Night Energypolarnightenergy.fiCommercial sand battery (~600 °C, ~100 MWh, ~90% round-trip)
10TechnologyWikipedia — Carnot batterywikipedia.orgDefinition; Thess/DLR 2018; round-trip 40–70%; study 57%
11TechnologyWikipedia — Stirling enginewikipedia.orgExternal-combustion regenerative engine; micro-CHP since 2003
12TechnologyAzelio (Sweden)Aluminium-PCM 600 °C + Stirling; bankruptcy 2022 (lesson)
13TechnologyIndustrial heat-battery vendorsRondo, Kraftblock, Brenmiller, MGA Thermal, EnergyNest
14TechnologyHeat-to-power vendorsORC & Stirling vendor landscape
15TechnologyDanish seasonal pit storesVojens, Marstal (~€30/m³; ~90–92% seasonal efficiency)
16UkraineHorizon Europeec.europa.euUkraine association since June 2022 (consortium eligibility)
17UkraineEU Ukraine Facility / EU4Energy / EBRD / USAID / MIGAReconstruction funding & war-risk insurance
18UkraineCandidate research partnersInstitute of Engineering Thermophysics; Pidhorny Institute; KPI; Lviv Polytechnic
19MaterialsStandard engineering referencescp, density, latent heat values for storage media (planning values)
24TechnologyBattery storage benchmarks (LiFePO4/LFP, NMC, lead-acid, sodium-ion)IEA / NREL ATB / BNEFCAPEX, round-trip, cycle life & safety for storage comparison (§6.1.1)
25TechnologyLong-duration & mechanical storage (PHES, CAES, LAES, flywheel, flow, H₂)IEA / IRENA / DOE-PNNLCAPEX, round-trip, duration & maturity for storage-alternatives matrix
26TechnologyCharging-source / renewable-resource referencesJRC PVGIS / Global Wind Atlas / EGECCharge cost, temperature, seasonality & regional fit for charging sources (§8.3–§8.4)